In defence of train guards and ticket offices

Part of the current industrial dispute between the RMT in particular and the railway companies is the apparent insistence that, in the name of “modernisation”, that ticket offices and train guards need to remain.

I am not going to comment on the whys and wherefores of the other aspects of the dispute (pay, hours, rostering, compulsory Sundays etc). But I must defend the need to retain both ticket offices and train guards.


Train guards of course play a safety critical role the way flight attendants and ferry staff do (and no-one is proposing eliminating them), particularly in terms of assisting with emergency evacuation and in ensuring that all doors are closed (DOO is inadequate for this as the driver’s view is very limited, as Diamond Geezer pointed out: https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2022/12/yet-more-london-transport-news.html).


But there is also the customer service role. Lots of people don’t feel comfortable with buying tickets from machines or online, and there are lots of types of tickets which cannot be bought this way, typically for revenue protection reasons (e.g. excesses, staff-discounted tickets, some Rovers, and Groupsave at least used to be this way). There is also the need for a place where passengers can obtain journey advice. While at major stations there may be specific customer information points, these don’t exist at smaller stations. It might be argued that gateline staff could do at least some of these functions (where they exist!) but gateline staff have a reputation for wanting to penalise passengers with incorrect tickets rather than assist, and any assistance requiring a fare adjustment would (for personal safety reasons) at least need some sort of enclosure for the staff member in which the money can be collected. (This is part of the function of the small boxes in London Underground stations near to the gateline on the paid side.)


It might also be argued that a nationwide Oyster-like or OV-chipkaart like system would remove the need for ticket offices and the ticket-selling role of train guards. It is however hard to see how this is practical with the fare system as it currently exists; it is difficult enough on Transport for London with the complications of needing the pink route readers. It is difficult to see how a nationwide stored-value (or contactless bank card based) system could work without massive changes to the fare structure such as standardising (or abolishing) peak/off peak fares and removing/reducing route restrictions. Those wanting such things should be careful what they wish for as it would be likely to mean significant fare rises for many regional journeys and fare cuts for peak journeys to/from/via London.


Nonetheless the government seem insistent on what would be a very passenger-unfriendly move which in my opinion should be resisted.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lacuna

In Gwent, we are told to only go to the Emergency Department for "life-threatening conditions", and yet the tier below is only for "minor injuries". So where do we go for things that threaten limb but not life? Or for more minor things that need checking out, e.g. recently I had a collapse at the supermarket checkout. (I did feel unsteady at best for a few minutes before the collapse and brief unconsciousness.) This seems to be a lacuna in the guidelines. Of course, when I did go there I was pushed from pillar to post. And the test that was in the end actually revealing, the blood test, wasn't done until after 10-12 hours. The nurse was very surprised it hadn't been done, then did it alarmingly quickly. The CT scan was normal (they did say it wasn't the best CT scanner but would find the big stuff). Still, a full work-up is I guess useful, and under the NHS it only cost me about £20 (a taxi home plus vending machine stuff).
Read more

Repeating because it's so good

I'm repeating this because I love it. And adding a link. https://compactmag.com/.../why-anne-applebaum-shot-down.../ Why did Anne Applebaum declare something “not interesting” after previously publishing a rebuttal, and why was the session summarily ended? This is the relevant rebuttal, which makes me so disappointed that what Anne wrote a long essay about became "not interesting". Is it rather "this is embarassing me and I don't want to talk about it"? https://www.theatlantic.com/.../smears-against.../616824/ Why was first year student Daniel Schmidt so good at embarrassing the pros? And the same goes for his friend Chris Phillips. https://thechicagothinker.com/thinkers-christopher.../ How are these two right-wing students able to embarrass the rest? Dan made the point that "keeping your head down" helps in recruitment for elite firms, if I were recruiting I'd look for people like Chris and Dan. https://collegedissident.com/conservatives-aband
Read more

A modest proposal

It has been suggested to me that if a police driver accidentally kills someone this deserves a long prison sentence and a £10 billion fine. I think this is unreasonable, not least because motoring is difficult and accidents, sometimes tragically fatal, happen, and motoring is much more dangerous and complicated than train driving or airliner flying. I therefore make a modest proposal, as follows: the road network will be divided into streets, on which pedestrians are allowed (with or without separate pavements but they will be allowed in the walkway) and motor-roads (on which pedestrians are not allowed) (motorways are unaffected and would continue as now) the speed limit on streets will be 20 mph or less  the speed limit on motor-roads will be as now alternative routes for pedestrians and cyclists, including free cycle lifts if necessary, will be provided to bypass motor-roads emergency services vehicles while using lights and sirens, and railed vehicles, will be exempt Driving at 20
Read more