Repeating because it's so good

I'm repeating this because I love it. And adding a link.
Why did Anne Applebaum declare something “not interesting” after previously publishing a rebuttal, and why was the session summarily ended?
This is the relevant rebuttal, which makes me so disappointed that what Anne wrote a long essay about became "not interesting". Is it rather "this is embarassing me and I don't want to talk about it"?
Why was first year student Daniel Schmidt so good at embarrassing the pros?
And the same goes for his friend Chris Phillips.
How are these two right-wing students able to embarrass the rest? Dan made the point that "keeping your head down" helps in recruitment for elite firms, if I were recruiting I'd look for people like Chris and Dan.

To be honest this is delicious. That two kids can embarrass the media elite so much that the session summarily ends with some weak words not addressing the issue is, frankly, shameful. But also delicious that Daniel and Chris can blow huge holes in them so easily. Ironically the conference was allegedly about "disinformation".

The media really need to up their game to not be embarassed like this. It's also disappointing that the other students apparently massively softballed in their questions. At least a lot are friends or at least “connections” with Chris and/or Daniel, so obviously they are not exactly pariahs there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What the UK High Speed Rail network should be

A modest proposal

How an inept company rules the world